Friday, April 15, 2011

Developmental Ethiopia!?

Development without the regulations of "Rule of law", devoid of civil and basic human rights; and above all within a framework of neocolonialist entanglement; not necessarily tied up to the classical western section, but to the new emerging ones,- I call them the new "invaders";  more unscrupulous than the old;  "developmental state" directly or indirectly under the growing tight grips of the global new formations of power, the oligarchic corporate state,  will certainly end up, counter to the national interests, in  a disparate economic growth and a miserable social justice.  Especially under circumstances and regions where there is no democratic governance and transparent control mechanisms, the state and the national interests are at the mercy and capacity of particular leaders of the so-called "developmental state", who can be whatever they could be - from bad to the worst!

The following is a relevant panel discussion:

http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/dhc/video/20101123_lang/index.html
Specially interesting on the new "invaders" of Africa (China, Saudi Arabian, India, Turkey, S. Korea etc.) is the contribution of  Srinivas Aravamudan (1*; somewhere in the middle of the panel clip.

http://www.fu-berlin.de/sites/dhc/news/r__ckblick_panel_postcolonialism.html

And for sure the new "invaders" know very well how they defend their "sphere of influence" once it is in their firm grips. The recent "Bahrain Occupation" by the Saudi Army is a telling example.

And going home, to Ethiopia, it is sometimes obnoxiously intolerable if you follow how "One Man", -certainly a "proxy -server" for the big Saudi- Man, King Abdulah-  sticks his finger in everything what would bring a penny. Even violating every simple rationality and governing regulations and procedures like (Ethiopian reporter head lines; the following links may be out of date):


be it in Gambella, Bensha gul, Adola mines or Addis ...all over the vast country. Even in a democratic state, which works hard to leave no room for its regulations like in Germany containing "Monopolies and Cartells" of all kinds is a huge difficult task; once it is rampant in the region.

የግብፅ ኩባንያ በቤኒሻንጉል ከፍተኛ የወርቅ ክምችት አገኘ

የሚሌኒየም ቦንድ ገበያው ደርቷል

በመላው ዓለም ከሚገኙ ኢትዮጵያውያንና ትውልደ ኢትዮጵያውያን የቦንድ ግዢ ጥያቄ እየቀረበ ይገኛል፡፡ በርካታ የዳያስፖራው አባላት በቀጥታ፣ በቤተሰቦቻቸውና በወኪሎቻቸው አማካይነት ቦንድ ለመግዛት እየተንቀሳቀሱ መሆኑም እየተነገረ ነው፡፡


Given the call that THIS ( economic growth and developmental state in the Ethiopian context) requires a well founded study and research by scholars and experts of the corresponding fields, common sense, political awareness and intuition with the background of African underdevelopment, however, tells a lot too.
All said (by political economists and sociologists of the century) concerning the economic dead lock and the never ending crisis of capitalist development and the human and environmental disaster this mode of production and relations, as it is, brought about to the human kind at large, there is for sure an alternative conscious and enlightened path, which, honoring a lot of our own traditional and cultural values, Africa could manage to step up, than to be a prey of the last vestiges of the troubled modes and relations of the “invaders”! 21st century could be Africa’s big opportunity to start much anew. Africa does not have to be the tails outlet of the contemporary troubled capitalist production and crisis, one after the other; financial, employment, environmental etc.
Now after the Japanese Fukushima Atomic Disaster,  I am sure they are working hard in closed doors on the "solar energy source  of the African Sahara" providing the alternative solution for the whole globe. And Africa will open its doors wide open as soon as they knock around. I.e. As forever and ever, we will play the role the Gods: "ankuaku yikefetilachuhal" -አንኩዋኩ ይከፈትላችውሃል Oh No more!
In Africa, paradoxically, in spite of the 20 years autocratic domination of his home country, "the good press Melese" gets once in a while, is a product of the “developmental state” he promotes to extend his rule for as long as possible and the presumable 2-digits economic growth rate (true or no) he is accredited to by some international monetary institutions. 

Let alone the past, even if one has taken into account only how he is uploaded up to antagonizing and polarizing the community to the extreme on  his recent "show up" on the Nile Project", which supposedly requires the solidarity of every social section of the nation, this press  is however simply not even worth the paper.

I.e.
The fishes get their prey, if only YOU "move, click and tick" (say... reflect) in the aquarium. If you "play & prey (even pray)" outside the aquarium...it is meaningless ...for the fishes..............

Nonetheless independent of the fact, which double digits or not are true, signifying the highly acclaimed Ethiopian economic growth rate propagated by Melese’s regime, the economic change is a “factor not to overlook"?


The best preparation for the democratic revolution or capitalism (in Europe) is also made by "Absolute Monarchy" (cf. Marcel Gauchet; the disenchantment of the world…). How disparate and entangled by the oligarchic powers of the “new invaders” it is, if the economy grows in the cumulated national dimension, it is ok too. Sooner or later the redistribution of wealth will somehow ensue; it is better if there is enough to reallocate ( It is not accidental or a gift of the almighty, that Tunisia took the lead in the ongoing social "Tsunami"in North Africa and the Arab World), but unfortunately it will unfold with a bigger complex since Melese has opened all holes and doors wide open for the new unscrupulous and rampant section of the external appropriators of the wealth (The favor to the new "invaders" comes not out of economic and national competitive advantages as one would expect, but only for the sake of secretive convenience in the interest of his local private party-affiliated corporate, to avoid transparency; and when
the “west”, once in a while confronts him with his bad governance and human rights violation records) . But on the other side of the coin, with this, Melese is also digging the best preparation to make himself superfluous. The very last show up for a better share and redistribution is not between Melese and the people but between the invaders and the latter ("Bahrain” speaks!); -Like the lady, who sooner or later would get rid of her pimp, when she is aware enough to take hold of her own body.  

Or after so much humiliation and endurance, it will end up in a tragedy like the following event, which took an extreme turn, recording the shame and the fury of the misery,

„Mikerew Mikerew Imbi sil Nikerew; Mekera yimkerew“ (2*

ምከረው ምከረው እምቢ ሲል ንከረው፡
መከራ ይምከረው።

*
These are words of emotions just before Easter Holidays and the MAY DAY.
May be A special MAY DAY for Ethiopia coming as a battalion of “May days”
“yeginbot qnoch”   ግንቦት ቀኖች challenging to end Melese’s 20 years rule.
Tunisia and Egypt are calling to Ethiopia!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Srinivas Aravamudan was appointed dean of the humanities in July 2009. At Duke, he is Professor in the Departments of English, Romance Studies, and the Program in Literature. He directed the John Hope Franklin Humanities Institute (2003-2009) and is president of the Consortium of Humanties Centers and Institutes from 2007-2012. He has published Tropicopolitans: Colonialism and Agency, 1688-1804 (1999, Duke University Press) and Guru English: South Asian Religion In a Cosmopolitan Language (2006, Princeton University Press and 2007, Penguin India). His next book, Enlightenment Orientalism: Resisting the Rise of the Novel, will be published by the University of Chicago Press in 2011."   

(2* Ethiopian proverb: "Give him all advice you can, if he declines let him decline and learn through suffering"
 

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

A Story of An Ethiopian

"Make it simple but not less simple" (cf. Einstein)

It has never been and it is never the "war rhetoric"  of the autocracy of Melese that Ethiopia needs for its development.

BUT

"the sprit of Mandela and Nyrere, the spirit of working for a common good across ethnic, religious and political difference, with respect to each other, honesty, justice," ... and ..." democracy ...." (cf. below)

Please read the following real telling story of an Ethiopian promoting the need for our unity, reproduced here again ( original, Abugida, December 11, 2008);  because of its very actuality; in these days of "Social Tsunami" turning the tyrannies of our African continent and the Arab world upside down:

 

“United We Stand, Divided We Fall” 

 (http://www.abugidainfo.co/?p=6910)


He, the story teller concludes on His own Self:

"Other than this prayer, what do I know? I am just an engineer and a “real” Ethiopian: 3/8 Gurage, 2/8 Sidamo, 2/8 Oromo and 1/8 Amhara."


This could as well be a story of the big section of our modern Ethiopia with all possible proportions and variations, in contradistinction to the idolizers of "exclusivity", which is, be it or not, meaningless!
Let's come to the 21st century! Enlightenment is "the magic"! AND, the diversity and our difference make us actually more beautiful, if only we could learn the art of living together with compassion and empathy.


****************
“United We Stand, Divided We Fall”  (http://www.abugidainfo.co/?p=6910)

Berhane Worku (1*

The “True” Ethiopian - December 11, 2008
This article was inspired by the November 16, 2008 meeting that was held in Minneapolis among individuals from the Ethiopian community, ethnic groups and political organizations in Minnesota. The purpose was to freely discuss issues of common concern, such as, human rights violations, starvation and economic hardship faced by our compatriots back in Ethiopia, and it was a very successful meeting in that regard.
The November meeting was initiated by Mr. Obang Metho, founder/member of The Solidarity Movement for New Ethiopia (SMNE). SMNE is “a newly formed grassroots movement whose mission is to mobilize Ethiopians in the Diaspora and within Ethiopia to unite in a coalition across ethnic, regional, political, cultural, and religious lines around principles of truth, justice, freedom, the protection of human rights, equality and civility in order to bring about a more open, free and reconciled society in Ethiopia where humanity comes before ethnicity and where the same rights, opportunities and privileges are available to all because no one will be free until all are free”.
I would like to share a bit of my personal history that I also shared in the November 16th meeting; because it might shed some light on the difficulties we are having in working across ethnic, religious, and political divisions to counter the disastrous policies of EPRDF in Ethiopia.
The conquest, the economic exploitation and the prejudices were real.
I was born and raised in the Gedeo area in Sidamo. My ethnicity: 3/8 Gurage, 2/8 Sidamo, 2/8 Oromo and 1/8 Amhara. How about that for a “true” Ethiopian? How did I get so mixed up?
When Menelik’s army invaded the Sidamo area about a century ago, one young Muslim Gurage man, Deluka, joined the army. His own land, Gurage, had just been recently subjugated. Deluka ended up in a small settlers’ garrison village, called Bulai, high in the mountains overlooking the present day city of Dilla. Bulai was chosen for its defensive position and for being away from the malaria infested lowlands. It lay in the transition zone between the Gedeo and the Matti Oromo communities, two indigenous ethnic groups in the area. Somewhere along the way, this Gurage Muslim, Deluka, changed his name to Gebeyehu, an Amhara name, and converted to Christianity.
About the same time, another young man, Kenee, a Selale Oromo from the present day Addis Ababa area joined Menelik’s army, and he too ended up in Bulai. A third young man, Nigatu, from Amhara Syint, deep in Wollo, fled his village because he had killed somebody. He showed up in Shoa, and married a beautiful Abichu Oromo lady, Hikee Argano. The family joined Menelik’s army, and also ended up in Bulai. These were some of my great grandparents.
Members of the conquering army were each given land taken from the indigenous Gedeo and Matti people, along with the people that were on the land. The indigenous people were described by the settlers as”Gebbar”. That was Menelik’s way of paying his army. The settlers lived a relatively comfortable life economically, exploiting the free labor of their Gebbars.
The settlers also developed a sense of superiority. Years passed, some of the descendents of the settlers became poor, even poorer than some of the peasants in coffee growing areas to the south, but they still lived with their sense of superiority. Others like my parents, added wealth, and of course, kept their sense of superiority. Along the way, my grandfather himself born in Bulai fathered a son out of wedlock from an indigenous Sidamo lady. The child was my father. My Sidamo grandmother took the Amhara name Birke, and she became a devout Ethiopian Orthodox Christian, in other words, she was thoroughly Amharanized. I knew her intimately since she lived in our house until her death. My father never publicly admitted his mother was a Sidamo. He talked about his Abichu grandmother, Hike, fondly, but specially emphasized his Amhara heritage. My father’s ethnicity: 1/2 Sidamo, ¼ Amhara and ¼ Oromo.
A bit of a related anecdote— in 1975 just before my grandmother died at about age 95, my two early-teen siblings had a new discovery. One said to the other, “I did not know Ako (Oromo word for grandmother) is a Sidamo”. To which my grandmother, whom they though was asleep, replied, “My children, don’t be ashamed that I am a Sidamo, I am a good Christian!”, as if just being a Sidamo was not enough. The prejudice had been internalized by even the victim herself.
Here are some of the prejudices that developed in Gedeo as a consequence of this shameful history. There were no problems with legal marriages among the settlers in Bulai village, Amhara vs. Shoa Oromo vs. Gurage. But there were no openly acknowledged marriages between any one of the settler groups and the locals. Not even between the Shoa Oromo and the Matti, the local Oromo. In the eyes of the settlers, the Gedeos and the Matti were cowards, merciless savages (aremenes), and less intelligent than the settlers. This story would, I think, sound very familiar to African Americans and Native Americans here in America. The fact is, the settlers were lucky to have had their clunky 19th century guns while the locals had none during the conquest. The locals were, of course, just as cowardly, brave, intelligent, or dumb as the settlers were. These are individual traits, not group traits.
So, I grew up a privileged son of a local landlord, but my playmates were Gedeo children. I went to their home and shared their food from the same container. If they came to my home, they were given food. My mother was considered a very kind lady by the locals, and I think rightly so. Yes, they were given food, but in a different container, not sharing with me.
The reaction from the oppressed and their descendents is understandable, but the solution sought by some of them now is not.
So, when I hear about separatist movements here and there in southern Ethiopia, I am not surprised. There is alienation and hurt, and I fully understand where this is coming from—past economic exploitation and cultural domination by northerners, embodied in the word, “Amhara”. However, do I support the separatists politically or otherwise? Absolutely, not! I do not believe the goal of the separatists, creating an independent state, even if achieved, a big if, is in the long-run interest of the very people they say they are fighting for.
Look at the Eritreans. What did they achieve after all that momentous struggle and independence? They substituted one dictator for another, Issayas for Mengistu. They had conflicts with their neighbors, and eventually ran into a major war that cost more human life in two years than the thirty years they fought so gallantly for their ”liberation”. I personally knew a few of those fighters from my school days. I will especially never forget one, Haile Selassie Gebreigzi, the gentlest of souls. He was picked up by the Dergue’s security, most probably tortured, but eventually murdered while in a prison. Haile could well have been an EPLF member, but the point is he was murdered without due process. No surprise there for Ethiopians. Torture and extra judicial killings were and still are a common occurrence. Haile, my friend, rest in peace. May be it is better that you died for what you believed in rather than lived to see what your comrades and your struggle produced, another tyranny, not a prosperous, vibrant, democratic Eritrea, at peace with itself and the world.
Today there is another round of struggle to try overthrowing Issayas’ regime. Recently, I stumbled on a young Eritrean man in a building, who was directing people to a meeting of an opposition Eritrean group that I did not know about. I was also surprised to read in a publication by the Economist that for 2006 Eritrea was No. 13 among countries of origin of asylum applications to industrial countries. For comparison, Somalia was No.9, and Iraq was No. 1.
What about the thousands of soldiers and officers of the Ethiopian army who paid the ultimate in fighting gallantly for Ethiopian unity beyond and above their soldering duties? How many thousands more from other national opposition groups, like EPRP, or separatist groups, like TPLF and OLF have perished under the Dergue, just like Haile. They were fighting for lofty ideals—Ethiopian unity and/or “to liberate” the oppressed. The result is similar to what happened in Eritrea. Ethiopia too substituted Meles for Mengistu. Meles is a sinister dictator who is wreaking havoc in the Ogden. He continues to plant poisonous seeds of mistrust and resentment which could potentially erupt in far worse inter ethnic conflicts in the future. People of good will need to act in unison to diffuse it, and redirect the energy into getting rid of Meles and building the new Ethiopia. Mengistu was at least on the right tract on this front. The Ethiopian revolution had brought in millions more from previously forgotten ethnic groups into the Ethiopian family. Mengistu was at least an equal opportunity oppressor, who did not favor one ethnic group over another as long as his power was not questioned.
The folly of the two tyrants, one in Ethiopia and the other Eritrea, cost both our peoples tens of thousands of lives and diverted our meager resources away from urgently needed development work. The saga continues. Now, instead of resolving the remaining border dispute peacefully based on the verdict of the mutually agreed on Eritrea-Ethiopia Border Commission, the two armies are staring at each other across the border ready to spill more blood. One would think a rational and humane solution would be to give the local people on the border area the option to resettle on either side of the border, assist them in the resettlement, and demarcate the border for once and all. Instead, the two tyrants rather continue to play up the past ill feelings developed from historical interactions between the Tigrayans in Ethiopia and their brethren on the Eritrean side to prepare their armies for another round of conflict. The real motivation of Meles and Issayas—power and ego! The main hardships of such conflicts fall, as always, on the peasants who continue to lose their children and bear the brunt of the economic cost. Both the Eritrean and Ethiopian people at large lose too because of the economic burden of war, and the lost opportunity of badly needed development work. Meles and Issayas are just fine, thank you.
What about Somalia? How did it fare since independence? Not very well. The last 18 years have been a long nightmare, even excluding, the recent intervention by Meles’ regime on the behalf of America. That’s a major disaster created by Meles and Bush that immensely exacerbated the existing political and humanitarian problems in Somalia, and clearly is not in the interest of Ethiopia or the long-term interest of America. Even before the intervention, Somalia had been consumed in inter-clan conflict. The lesson—even ethnic and religious homogeneity alone does not assure peace, democracy and progress.
Will all the inter-ethnic violence magically disappear once we have a genuinely democratic government in Ethiopia? I would like to believe it will diminish greatly, but it will not completely disappear in the foreseeable future. Such a democratic government would need to constantly work to proactively resolve such potential conflicts peacefully, but, would not hesitate to revert to legal and appropriate application of force to keep the peace without any favoritism to one side or the other. Such an Ethiopia will have a strong, well trained, agile police and paramilitary force. After all, keeping the peace is one of the main duties of a government worth the name. This vision is, of course, just the opposite of what Meles is doing in the country now, despite what he says. Action speaks louder than words.
I focused on Eritrea and Somalia because first, we are dealing with history as it unfolds, and second and more importantly, because of the geographic proximity to and the similarities of culture and the level of development to that of Ethiopia. In general, it seems to me the track record of “liberation” or independence movements in the third world is not very good. The odds of having functioning democratic mini-states sprouting from the present day Ethiopia and being able to concentrate on the monumental task of development is even much more remote. For starters, such mini states will run into endless Ethiopia-Eritrea type “border” conflicts based on just who came where first, heightened by population pressures and competition for resources. How is the border between Oromia and Amhara, or Ogaden and Oromia going to be drawn? What would be the basis for negotiating borders between such mini states? Ethiopia and Eritrea had at least the colonial boarder to begin with, which is recognized by the African Union as acceptable basis for demarcating borders of post-colonial African states. This is not to mention the ethnic and religious differences that will be exploited by cynical power-hungry leaders, i.e. Meles multiplied many times. I believe, there is a much better chance of achieving a functioning multi-ethic democratic new Ethiopia where all its children will feel at home, and where they will eventually concentrate on the real enemies of the country—poverty, ignorance and environmental degradation. In that endeavor, first each of us needs to examine our own attitudes and actions, and work to correct them so that we are least not at part of the problem.
I do not understand, therefore, the basis for the separatist movements. It appears the position held by some, I emphasize, “some” well educated southerners goes like this: We had been exploited in the past and are being exploited now, Amharas and Tigrayans are the causes of our miseries, if only we could have a separate state, we could practice true democracy and develop our land, language and culture.
My reading of history says Amharas and Tigrayans are not uniquely evil, and they did not subjugate the indigenous people in the south just by themselves. Refer to my own personal history, and what is happening now under Meles. The same domination of one culture over another, the same exploitation of one over the other would have happened if the Anuaks, the Sidamos, the Oromos, the Somali or any of the other ethnic groups were the dominant group in what is now called the country of Ethiopia. If the historical Ogadeni Somali, Ahmad ibn Ibrihim al-Ghaze (Ahmad Gragn) had succeeded in conquering the whole of Ethiopia in the 16th century, which he actually almost did, yes, present day Ethiopia would have been a different country, but most probably not a more just and democratic one. The story is also not uniquely Ethiopian either. Europe’s history was built in blood and gory. Africa’s history is being made in blood and gory in front of our eyes. Relative peace and respect for human rights even in Western Europe is only a recent phenomenon that flourished under democratic states, and still occasionally falters
The second position I don’t understand comes from some, I again emphasize “some”, quite well educated northerners. Here is how it goes: I am proud of the Ethiopian civilization that produced the only written language in Black Africa, I am proud of the three thousand years of unbroken history, and an Ethiopia that held off the white man during the colonial scramble for Africa in the 19th century. Therefore, I have nothing to do with Somali or Oromo or other social organizations, they are all separatists or at the service of separatist organizations.
I too am proud of some, not all, of the past history of Ethiopia. The positive achievements in the past are not just Ethiopian history, but, they are part of African history. It is in fact a small, but notable, contribution to world heritage. The development of terracing and soil management by our Konso people in the south is also admirable, and something I am proud of. However, the appreciation of the positive does not stop me from acknowledging the negative, or appreciating all cultures and working with people from Ethiopia of different ethnicity on issues of common interest.
Ethiopia held together by outbursts of massive human rights violations is not only unsustainable, but also undesirable. I cannot imagine how a truly democratic individual would entertain such an Ethiopia. Even at the practical level, such a policy will actually assure the ultimate disintegration of the country. This is the 21st century when there is world wide ethnic and religious awaking, mass communication and commerce, not Menelik’s 19th century. Instead, let’s celebrate diversity and direct the energies released from ethnic and religious awaking to positive ends.
On the other hand, there are two middle positions that I empathize with.
I have traveled in Amhara country quite a bit because I used to work for rural water supply under Dergue. I have witnessed abject poverty and lack of roads, clinics and schools. Somebody who is raised in such an environment, and has limited knowledge or understanding of what happened in the south during the last century or so may have a different perspective of current Ethiopian issues. Such a person would ask, “What special thing did Haile Selassie do for the Amharas? The Dergue has returned the land to the peasants in the south, what else do they want? They are just filled with a hatred of Amharas.
The other position that I empathize with is the one that says, “We have been treated so badly by the dominant group in the past, I don’t trust Amharas and Tigrayans; otherwise, in the best of all worlds, leave alone united Ethiopia, even united Africa would make sense. I will support and worry about my ethnic group and work to develop its language and culture.”
Some in these two groups may be people who are interested in public affairs, but are not yet comfortable to work across ethnic boundaries.
The solution: help build a democratic culture and institutions—no more God anointed kings or chiefs to save us. Modernity is rushing head-on towards us, adapt or perish.
There is no easy solution to building a multi-ethnic democratic Ethiopia, To those who have contributed in the past, or are contributing now to this endeavor, I say good work, keep it up. I especially have high regard for individuals who are taking real risk in genuinely pursuing lofty goals on behalf of the people by exposing themselves and their families to harassment, economic discrimination, imprisonment, and in some cases, yes, paying with their dear lives. To those of us who have dropped out or have been sort of on the sidelines all along for one reason or another, the time is not too late. The struggle will be long since it is not just to get rid of a regime, but more importantly, it is to build democratic culture and institutions from the bottom up. The task is a huge one; no one ethnic, religious, civic, or political group will solve it alone. We will either all swim through the rough waters to a more tranquil future, or all drown together in inter clan, inter ethnic and inter religious violence, at the complete mercy of marauding warlords like in Somalia.
Let’s build a democratic society with justice and peace for all in as relatively short a period as possible by learning from the experiences of others and ourselves. We don’t have to reinvent the wheel in either the political or technological field. Is there anything we can learn from Indian democracy practiced, however haltingly, in a multi-ethnic and multi-religious society? The divisions in Ethiopia cannot be worse than those in India. I say yes; there is a very good chance we can build a just democratic multi-ethnic society in Ethiopia. The task would not be easy, but it could start right here among us wherever we are.
Let’s start the dialogue now across ethnic, religious and political barriers. For starters let’s collaborate and condemn gross human rights violations in the Ogaden, not because ONLF says so, but because it has been documented by international human rights groups. Meles claims there are no human rights violations committed by the government. Good, let him open up the Ogaden and other conflict areas to international observers and humanitarian agencies so that the truth comes out, and the needy are helped, especially now when there is an acute food shortage, bordering on starvation on a massive scale. We can and should work together to bring these issues to the international leaders and the public so as to increase the pressure on Meles’ regime.
Let’s also protest any individual human rights violations. Let’s awaken from our numb state where we sometimes accept such isolated government sanctioned killings, and disappearances as normal. Otherwise, all talk about democracy and human rights will not do much. Let’s insist on openness and democratic practices in any organization we belong to, political or civic. Let’s be wary of leaders who suggest directly or indirectly that “the end justifies the means”. Some of us older folks have witnessed what happens when too idealistic political movements like those that were inspired by communism take hold. What happened in Ethiopia and around the world is history—death and distraction. Just remember the Khmer Rouge as the extreme case, and Meles’s and Issayas’ regimes at a different level. We should be wary of such movements, whether political or religious since, they are more often than not, the breeding grounds of leaders that will eventually become dictatorial when they come to power. In other words, I don’t believe that an opposition movement that is not itself democratic while in opposition will be democratic when in power.
Our task should be to examine our behaviors and actions and try to align them with what we honestly proclaim to be our values are. Let’s consciously work on those attitudes and actions we would like to change, instead of denying their existence. Let’s encourage the immergence of leaders that have shed a lot of the baggage of prejudice that they carried on from their childhood environment.
Sometimes prayer helps too.
Africa did not only produce leaders who were or are corrupt, narrow-minded, megalomaniacs like Idi Amin, Charles Taylor, Mugabe, Mengistu, Meles, Issayas and others. It produced also those who stepped down from power either voluntarily or through the ballot, the likes of Senghor of Senegal, and Kaunda of Zambia. It produced leaders such as Mandela and Nyrere of Tanzania who lived a life of service with honesty, humility and understanding. These are my great African heroes.
Therefore, let the sprit of Mandela and Nyrere, the spirit of working for a common good across ethnic, religious and political difference, with respect to each other, honesty, justice, democracy pervade our leaders and us.
Other than this prayer, what do I know? I am just an engineer and a “real” Ethiopian: 3/8 Gurage, 2/8 Sidamo, 2/8 Oromo and 1/8 Amhara.
----------------------------------------------
(1* Berhane! Thanks for this telling story and brilliant contribution. I read it first today (two years later and still actual) after I stumbled into a clip showing you with a note of message and surfing more. You were a best friend of mine, during the genuine and honest (albeit naive) days of the early youth with the big Will to change Ethiopia and the world. You were the best of our batch, and I always admired your genie for the best results with the least effort. In between I have met a lot of brilliant friends who lost their lives for their noble causes and a few who have survived the heat of our young days, but concerning you two points have always remained in my mind. 1. In our very early correspondence, way back before the Ethiopian revolution, during my /our, the youth/ infatuation for the "dictatorship of the proletariat", I couldn't forget the scepticism you clearly noted on the "dictatorship" phenomenon. 2. After decades of a sudden encounter, on a walk in Merkato in the troubled days of my youth, looking at a lady with a pair of small items in a "gulit"/ a local market/ , you said in a passing, "look at these people; these are the real heroes of life, who take LIFE as it presents itself to them, with the biggest WILL to work, live and survive. And We (the elite), in contrast are never satisfied with our lot and complain all our life long." 
That is IT. We have to change! The rest is a nice play and a gift! Of What? Even after decades, I still don't know! Hoping to see you in one bright day of Ethiopia in THIS LIFE!

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Logic Course for the Nile Project

 Nile Project = Ethiopia – “nech-lebashoch”= EPRDF

Elaboration:
Universal Theorem 1; for poli maths:
Dangerous for a minority is the majority.

Universal Theorem 2; for ethnic poli-maths:
Dangerous for a minority ethnic rule is the ethnic majority

Ethiopian application:
1. Contain majority
2. Contain ethnic majority
3. Attack the radical majority section
4. Dismember all majority affiliations

Majority --> Ethnic majority --> radical majority --> all majority --> every member
All Ethiopians--> Oromos --> OLF ---> Legal Oromo-parties --> intimidate every member of the majority

Ethiopia has to get rid of its enemies for its developing existence. In the Nile Project, the Enemies are functionally chained to Egypt as follows.

Enemy EGYPT = A function (variable, Eritrea)
Enemy Eritrea = A function (variable, Terrorism); Terrorists: OLF etc.
Enemy Terrorism/OLF = A function (variable, medrek)
Enemy medrek = A function (varable, opposition parties)
Enemy Opp.Parties = A function (variable, majority Ethiopians)
Enemy majority = A function (variable, Oromos)
Enemy Oromos = A function (variable, others)
Enemy Others = A function (variable, none-eprdfs)

That means in the final analysis,
Enemy Egypt = a function ( variable,none-eprdfs)

That means all none-eprdfs are enemies.
These enemies are called “nech-lebashoch”/ “the third battalion”

Enemies/”Nech-lebashoch”/ have to be made dysfunctional or eliminated for the Nile Project to function.

Nile project = Ethiopia – none-eprdfs = EPRFites = ETHIOPIA
Nile project = EPRDF(1*= ETHIOPIA

Who are the none-eprdfites?  The Anti-meleses.

All these variables have got a name called: "nech-lebashoch" because they all work against the Ethiopian development.
 
And which are the majority of these “nech-lebashoch”, among the population of Ethiopia?
The OROMOS.
Oromos are variables of Eritrea: I.e. Eritrea = Function( oromos).

Therefore if you attack Oromos, you have attacked Eritrea and can consider it as declaring war on Eritrea. Accordingly, if you make them dysfunctional you can remain in power for long and avoid the social contagion of Egypt and Tunisia!

***
1*) EPRDF was 30 years ago a function of Eritrea and Egypt. Therefore there can still be some eprdfites, who have still remained “nech-lebashoch”. All those “anti-melese” eprdfites  are still “nech-lebashoch “and enemies.

Monday, April 4, 2011

Slavoj Žižek

Slavoj Žižek on Hegel!


The Slowenian Philosopher Slavoj Žižek made a lecture on Hegel in Dahlem Humanities Center/ "Free University Berlin"/ "Freie Universität Berlin".

31.03.2011, 19:00 
**********************
The guest philosopher was invited in the "Freie Universität Berlin"/FU Berlin/, by Dahlem Humanities Center...

Even If you don’t fully share his perception and philosophy, listening to this man was a relish!  A relish for the mind! All the more, having in mind the pathetic display, our "philosophers" of his generation are making today; either serving tyrants or
disseminating their gospels of hate and vengeance.

The man is a display of authentic thought in action, on stage for demonstration; speaking with all his body and temperament. He reminded me of one young philosopher, - killed by the military regime in the 80s struggling for a better Ethiopia, who was fugitive while talking and discussing; may be an attribute of real philosophers!

Audi Max (Henry Ford Bau, the biggest hall of the university ) was full of young people and some old University-staff; tight including the Foyer upstairs. It looked like one of the teach-ins in the troubled days of the 70s… I would guess 500-700 men and women. There were hardly any guest public intellectuals during the recent past, who were visited by such a mass of young people! Even the South African Nobel peace laureate, Archbishop Desmond Tutu during his University “Award for Freedom”  (clip) could not attract as much attendee as Slavoj Žižek did.



Slavoj Žižek appeared in his accustomed T-shirt/Pullover. After a short unspectacular greeting in German, he said in a joke...to make his position/”Weltanschauung”  at the outset clear, 

" Sorry my German is insufficient, I have to use the language of Imperialism"...

As soon as he begins with his thoughts, in his brilliant fugitive way, he just takes control of your attention so that you have to participate in the process of his thoughts, developing his lecture on the move; out of the notes he seems to improvise in the air and at the moment.  Any "gentleman „ even  if he happens to be  uncomfortable in the non-elegant appearance of the "professor", looking  at Zizek's accustomed  T-shirt-Pullover,  may be forced to take part immediately in this process.  - He would say; a demonstration of the Hegelian dialectics of content and form, here, with content taking over the supremacy!
*
After more than 60 minutes uninterrupted discourse on the Theme; " Is it still possible to be Hegelian?"; declaring or interpreting almost every philosopher or artists he mentioned  to be in effect a Hegelian in disguise,  including spiritual leaders like Jesus and "god" himself in absentia, incapable of saving his own "Son" from suffering,  delegating the problem to humanity etc. etc.  even with a reprimand that Hegel himself was not “Hegelian” enough; and interpreting  Marx for not "inversing" Hegel but accusing him of being less "Hegelian" than he could have been, but a condition Hegel couldn't help.....living in the era of small manufactures, without the development of science  as we know it today  and "Capital" just  in the period of its initial birth....leaving the challenge for Marx to help him later in  political economy...and we today are left with the legacies  of the Adorno’s  etc...to reflect more on "globalization"....
*
I would say, He, as a materialist, even went so far to conclusively declare the supremacy of "thinking" to "action" in post modernity!

He said, „Still placated in the Humboldt University today, we have to inverse that famous message of Marx, "Philosophers have interpreted the world, the point is to change it”. A point which made us too keen for action has to be reversed again: "politicians have changed the world; the point is however now, to think it all over again and make it better.” (Paraphrased)
*
For him, it seemed that,

THE CONTEMPORARY NEW HEGELIAN amounts to be:

“THE CLASSICAL HEGEL x THE SECULAR INTERPRETATION OF CHRISTIANITY (love your enemy etc.) x THE INCLUSIVE DOCTRINE OF ISLAM x THE YOUNG MARX x KIERKEGAARD’S REPETETION + DELEUZE’S DISGUISED HEGLIANISM COMBINED TOGETHER WITH A FURTHER REFLECTION OF THE RIGHT EMERGING OUT OF THE MANY WRONGS; ALWAYS RESULTING IN THE BEAUTIFUL "UNKNOWN" – THE NEVER EXHAUSTED CONTINGENCY OF NEW REALITIES” (take x as interacting with).
*
The man is simply a demonstration of thinking per se. I enjoyed every second!
Just for your imagination to anticipate the scope of his proceedings...I would simply note (unstructured) some of the concepts, ideas and persons which crossed his mind and lips (hoping that the lecture will be available sometime in the future, at least in Audio to share it with the internet-public).

Adorno, Schoenberg, Music
Heinrich von Kleist
Kierkegaard, existentialism
Repetition
Dosteyevsky
Jesus, god, contingency
Nature, culture, nurture, education....
Imperialism
Terrorism,
Starbucks and African solidarity,
Even our solidarity sold in the commodity
Congo,
Catholicism
Deleuze, who didn’t know that he is a Hegelian.
Wagner, Tristan und Isolde
Adultery Love and marriage,
Sexuality, psychoanalysis
Freud
Kant,
Brecht,
Heisenberg
Bohr and Quantum Physic, the split experiment
Stephen Hawkins, searching for the Absolute
God
Hegel and the Absolute, negation of the negation etc.
The French revolution, Jacobins,
terror - antiterrorism,
the wrongs - and its cherubs the corrects etc.
Kafka,
Rabbis,
children games, battle games with the unknown end etc.
The Russian Rabi and Communism - two reasons to leave-(joke)
the Japan disaster; Atomic reactors, environment, ecology...
and  what not..
The right out the wrong, , emergence etc.
Russia and communism
our past, the present ...
etc.
may be almost all philosophers and intellectuals are in his minds, all like what he coined  in a joke as:
All "from Plato to NATO..."
*

HIS MESSAGE WAS MORE OR LESS:-

Think!  Think! Dare to Contemplate! And “THEY” will be afraid of “YOU”! High Time to think! Up to now, we were too keen to change the world...
*
After an hour and a half, accompanied by an uninterrupted applause, he left with the comment,

"Save your Applause for later. Don't worry, we will force you to applaud too, when we radical leftist come to power!" suggesting "think before you applaud"!
I.e. we can never be perfect.  The point is to be open for all contingencies; i.e. the unknown is beautiful
*
In a Word,

-the man has A beautiful MIND, worth attending and contemplating on what he has to say and convey!

-the man conveys some hope of the “second” wave of enlightenment coming to salvage our contemporary troubled humanity!

***********************************************************
Just for the intermediate period (the video/audio publication of his speech) here is a related Reference:

Sunday, March 27, 2011

THE NEW SOCIAL-REVERSE-ENGINEERING

“Make it simple but not less simple” (cf. Einstein)

THE NEW SOCIAL-REVERSE-ENGINEERING (SRE)
The “War Rhetoric” is only a medial playing ball thrown to occupy the mind of the opposition! Medial SRE Diversion campaign!
Please think of the hard fact, that Melese is not so stupid to make a real war against Eritrea, unless the threat of a mass uprising against the autocratic rule of Isayas becomes immediately real in Eritrea! This is just how dictators dandle eachother in reciprocal solidarity, even if they are apparently enemies!


Nonetheless it has a purpose. The purpose of the war rhetoric is
1- Provide dictator Isayas with a "beautiful" pretext to crash any social uprising against his rule, as an intervention from Ethiopia
2- Stifle all potential sources of the social “tsunami”s, which threaten the region; he has "secured" his own region
3- Save his own autocratic rule from any possible mass uprising in Ethiopia by damping the source of the social “fire” in “his” periphery region.
4- Discredit any social uprising against his own regime with his campaign that it is "designed from Shabia"


That is the New SRE, possibly designed in the Saudi courts, the refuge of all dictators.
1- Medial diversionary attacks, campaigns and manipulations
2- Preemptive security measures, like  threatening or declaring wars.
Measures against ”weak” dictators to save the “big” dictators; or
Ultimately armed occupation or support with armed forces direct intervention just before a mass uprising unfolds  …
Their lessons from the neighbor of Saudi Arabian, the “Bahrain” uprising, to prevent “NEW TUNISIAs”!

Thursday, March 24, 2011

The Success Story has no end...

The success story reported again,

"Addis Ababa, March 23 (WIC) - Saudi Star Agricultural Development Plc, a food company owned by billionaire Sheikh Mohammed al- Amoudi, said it plans to invest $2.5 billion by 2020 developing a rice-farming project in Ethiopia.
The company, based in Addis Ababa, leased 10,000 hectares (24,711 acres) in Ethiopia’s western Gambella region for 60 years at a cost of 158 birr ($9.42) per hectare annually, Chief Executive Officer Haile Assegide sai
d "  

A simple middle-class apartment in an average European city may cost $9,42 per square meter in a month, and annually this would be 12 times $9,42 per square meter.


That means, annually you would pay 12x more for the square meter than the Saudi investor does for the hectare in Gambella.  In other words with the annual-amount you pay for the square meter apartment, the Saudi investor gets 12 hectares; these are 120,000 square meters (1ha = 10,000).
If you can afford an apartment of 100 sq.meters, you would get a lease of 1200 hectares.
If you come together with 10 other Ethiopians under the same conditions, you would get a lease of 12000 hectares; 2000 hectares more than the Saudi Investor (10 000 ha.) would get.

If you have as much capital as you would pay for your apartment, it is an easy game.

If not and If you go to a bank to get the amount of capital what the Saudi Investor needs, this would amount to 10,000 x 9,42 = $ 94,200 a year. If you pay an interest of 10 % for this, it will be $9,420 per year. If you spare the extra 2000 ha. (to remain at the simple calculation),  you have enough savings to finance the interest for two consecutive years.  2000 x 9,42 = 2 x $9,420.

And at last all you need is the starting operative investment capital. A Start Capital, what a healthy nationally oriented commercial bank would be obliged to grant to its citizens. – Citizens, who are ready to work for themselves and the national development of their country.

To play with the round figures; How much?

"$2.5 Billion to Build Ethiopia Rice Farm." ...$2,500 000 000…This can make an investment of $250 000 each for 10 000 share-holders. The duration of the investment is 10 years, until 2020. In other words every shareholder needs to invest $25 000 per year on every hectare of the total of 10 000 hectares. Or one can make it cumbersome or a state-project with private holdings and a lot of combination-models are possible (1*. Given that 60% of the investment can be financed by a national development bank, the proprietors capital necessary for investment would be only $10 000 per year from each share-holder (10 000 share holders).

If you look behind the curtain; what the “big” investors are doing, is essentially nothing more than this calculation provided in all details by their canny-greedy consultants and accountants. They don’t perform miracles to get their capital out of the blues; and our big investor presumably collects also his investment capital, that he manages and administers,  from his 10 000 Saudi friends and citizens, who would employ all their influence of their King Abdullah to enforce  the protection of their investment in times of crisis, like what they are doing upto employing their armed forces in Bahrain these days - the days of social movements for Human Dignity.

Summa sammarum:
If there is the good Collective WILL, is this difficult for any state and government to organize and encourage its own citizens, to operate along this line; instead of going abroad in all directions of the globe, with “Land for Sale/ Ethiopia for Sale (clip)” shield, unless there is some hidden strategic agenda of domination etc.  – the new brand of Neocolonialism (clip).

BUT to be clear, the above narrative is only out of the perspective of the "investor and investment". The perception from the perspective of developing prosperity in coherence with the objective of sustaining nature and culture (the indigenous culture of the people) as a quality of life may however produce a very tragic story (clip).
 
In the context of the moment, it remains to say:

What a Success Story? 


Gambella/ Ethiopia for Sale-


During the last 20 years, every Ethiopian knows that the “melese-world-acclaimed/" "democratic election" by the ruling clique in Ethiopia has not taken place for the first time in 2010. As far as I remember this has never been traded by the Melese ruling clique, as "a five year contract with the people of Ethiopia" etc..  Moreover, the academic discourse about "Democracy" as a form of contract etc. is four centuries old, so that no one would hardly come on the notion to make this a theme of a press conference.


So why is "contract" a subject of discussion for Melese!


These days, I think when Melese is talking about "the contract“, be it remembering the crash course he made on the "Hobbes" and  "Locke’s” State;  or pedaling between "The state, is it me"?  "the king" or "the rule", there are  rather some other facts which are haunting him in his subconscious.  The contracts of the land grabbing and similar projects scattered for out-sales into the globe of investors around India, Saudi Arabia, China, South Korea, until recently even Libya and Egypt or Nigeria or  Djibouti etc. !


The subconscious, as diligent as it is in every creature makes the simple arithmetic like the above, without consulting him or his "Excellency",  and gives the notes to the conscious designated  as  a life-threatening fact, since any Ethiopian is more or less aware of this. It would thus look for a survival justification with the consequence of prattling some stuff, which would take every normal citizen by surprise:

"The five years contract I made with the people"; "I can do and leave what I like during these days!";
 
And the witty sub-conscious suggests further the soothing internal remark

„Don’t worry;  you will be relieved from the specter in five years; to win the next election again and again... and the contract is for your and your children’s whole life time ….-60 years and more!"

"You can do and leave what you like during these troubling days of year 2011; Moreover every social movement is a question of terrorism, security force, - or you can call it  - law and order; like every one of your genre does...Go ahead; tell them that you would chop their fingers (clip), if they don't  fit in the row...like the royal houses of the investors do it"!


And so the sub-conscious would delegate the conscious to spit out the context-less concepts in the realm of confusion to play the parody of the wise leader - the wise tyrant, to claim the  "honor" of the late Mubarek, who was being praised for his wisdom until very recently by almost all politicians of the "pragmatic school" from the west, the East, the Far East , Middle East and the whole Arab world as well, except his own people, to leave the polit-arena for good on the day of the "account" – 11.02.2 011  - The Dignity Day of Egypt – 

--
ከመቃብር በፊት...
ሰው ለመስራት ብቻ ከፍቀደ አየሩ
ክህነት ካላችሁ አሰቡ መርምሩ
ተራ  ከገባችሁ ዘክሩ አስዘክሩ
ያልሆነው እንዲሆን ምከሩ ሞክሩ~~~
ሽቀጣና ሽቀት እንዳይሆን ሃገሩ
አንድ ቀን እንደሆን አይቀር መቃ-ብሩ።

***
"Move, Click and Tick" in the aquarium!

*** collective
** interactive
* sovereign

(1*. 
Area/share(ha)
Operating capital ($)
Share-capital ($)
Shareholders’ number
Investment duration/year
1
2,500 000 000
250 000
10 000
10
1
2,50 000 000
25 000
10 000
1
0,1
2,50 000 000
2 500
100 000
1
0,01
2,50 000 000
250
1000 000
1
0,001
2,50 000 000
25
10 000 000
1